[참고문헌] 심적 표상 관련 참고문헌

심적 표상 관련 논문 모음집인 <S. Stich and Warfield, T. (eds.), Mental Representation: A Reader, Wiley-Blackwell>에 실린 논문들이다. 주제별로 서로 상반되는 입장을 가진 논문이 두 개씩 실려 있다. 대부분 학술지나 다른 논문 모음집에 실린 논문들을 재수록한 것이지만, 몇 가지 논문들은 이 논문 모음집에 처음으로 실렸다(처음 실린 논문은 '※'로 표시).

Part I: Introduction

※ 1. Introduction: Ted A. Warfield and Stephen Stich.

2. Fodor's Guide to Mental Representation: Jerry Fodor.

3. Mental Representation: Hartry H. Field.

Part II: The Theories

Conceptual Role Semantics

4. Advertisment for a Semantics for Psychology: Ned Block.

5. Why Meaning (Probably) Isn't Conceptual Role: Jerry Fodor and Ernest Lepore.

Information Based Semantics

6. Misrepresentation: Fred Dretske.

7. From Information to Intentionality: Barry Loewer.

Asymmetric Dependence

8. A Theory of Content, II: The Theory: Jerry Fodor.

9. Fodorian Semantics: Fred Adams and Ken Aizawa.

Teleogy

10. Biosemantics: Ruth Millikan.

※ 11. A Continuum of Semantic Optimism: Peter Godfrey-Smith. 

Interpretational Semantics

※ 12. Interpretational Semantics: Robert Cummins.

※ 13. Computation and Mental Representation: Terence Horgan.

Intentional Systems Theory

14. True Believers: The Intentional Strategy and Why it Works: Daniel Dennet.

15. Instrumental Intentionality: Lynne Rudder Baker.

Part III: Epilogue

16. What is a Theory of Mental Representation? Stephen Stich.

[참고문헌] Alex Byrne and Agustín Rayo, 2015년 1학기 Topics in Philosophy of Mind(Mental Content) 강의계획서

MIT 언어 및 철학과 대학원 개설 과목

Part I: De Se Thought

1

- Perry, John. "The Problem of the Essential Indexical." Nous 13, no. 1 (1979): 3–21. (Blackwell Publishing)

- Lewis, David. "Attitudes De Dicto and De Se." The Philosophical Review 88, no. 4 (1979): 513–43. (Duke University Press)

2

- Anscombe, G. E. M. "The First Person."

- Stalnaker, Robert C. "Indexical Belief." Synthese 49, no. 1 (1981): 129–51.

Supplementary Reading

- Kripke, Saul. Chapter 10 in Philosophical Troubles: Collected Papers, Volume 1. Oxford University Press, 2011. 

- Stalnaker, Robert C. Chapter 3 in Our Knowledge of the Internal World. Oxford University Press, 2010. 

- Campbell, John. "What Is It to Know What 'I' Refers To?" The Monist 87, no. 2 (2004): 206–18.

3

- Cappelen, Herman, and Josh Dever. Chapters 3 and 5 in The Inessential Indexical: On the Philosophical Insignificance of Perspective and the First Person. Oxford University Press, 2013. 

Supplementary Reading

- Magidor, Ofra. "The Myth of the De Se."

- Ninan, Dilip. "What is the Problem of De Se Attitudes?" 

- Devitt, Michael. "The Myth of the Problematic De Se."

Part II: Propositions

4

- Stalnaker, Robert C. Chapter 1 in Inquiry. MIT Press, 1984.

- Field, Hartry. "Critical Notice: Stalnaker, Robert - Inquiry." Philosophy of Science 53, no. 3. (1986): 425–48.

Supplementary Reading

- Rayo, Agustín. Chapter 4 in The Construction of Logical Space. Oxford University Press, 2013. 

- Elga, Adam, and Agustín Rayo . "Fragmentation and Information Access."

5

- King, Jeffrey C., Scott Soames, and Jeff Speaks. Chapters 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 12 in New Thinking about Propositions. Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 32–5, 47–50, 64–70, 72–6, and 91–7.

Part III: Knowing How

6

- Stanley, Jason, and Timothy Williamson. "Knowing How." The Journal of Philosophy 98, no. 8 (2001): 411–44.

- Noë, Alva. "Against Intellectualism." Analysis 65, no. 288 (2005): 278–90.

Supplementary Reading

- Fodor, Jerry A. "The Appeal to Tacit Knowledge in Psychological Explanation." The Journal of Philosophy 65, no. 20 (1968): 27–640.

- Glick, Ephraim. "Practical Modes of Presentation." Nous 49, no. 3 (2015): 538–59.

- ———. "Two Methodologies for Evaluating Intellectualism." Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83, no. 2 (2011): 398–434.

7

- Stanley, Jason. Chapter 7 in Know How. Oxford University Press, 2011.

- Rumfitt, Ian. "Savoir Faire." The Journal of Philosophy 100, no. 3 (2003): 158–66.

Supplementary Reading

- Ryle, Gilbert. The Concept of Mind. University Of Chicago Press, 2000. 

- Santorio, Paolo. "Nonfactual Know-How and the Boundaries of Semantics." 

- Snowdon, Paul. "I—Knowing How and Knowing That: A Distinction Reconsidered." Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) 104, no. 1 (2004): 1–29.

Part IV: Perceptual Content

8

- Logue, Heather. "Experiential Content and Naïve Realism: A Reconciliation."

Supplementary Reading

- Brewer, Bill. "How To Account For Illusion." 

- Siegel, Susanna. "Do Perceptual Experiences Have Contents?" 2009.

* Byrne, Alex. "Experience and Content." The Philosophical Quarterly 59, no. 236 (2009): 429–51.

- Schellenberg, Susanna. "Perceptual Content Defended." Nous 45, no. 4 (2011): 714–50.

- Pautz, Adam. "What Are The Contents of Experiences?" The Philosophical Quarterly 59, no. 236 (2009): 483–507.

9

- Speaks, Jeff. "Is There a Problem About Nonconceptual Content?" The Philosophical Review 114, no. 3 (2005): 359–98.

- Van Cleve, James. "Defining and Defending Nonconceptual Contents and States." Philosophical Perspectives 26, no. 1 (2012): 411–30.

Supplementary Reading

- Byrne, Alex. "Perception and Conceptual Content." 

10

- McDowell, John. "Lecture III: Non-conceptual Content." In Mind and World. Harvard University Press, 1994.

- ———. "Avoiding the Myth of the Given."

Supplementary Reading

- Travis, Charles. "The Silences of the Senses." Mind 113, no. 449 (2004): 57–94.

Part V: The Knowledge Argument

11

- McDowell, John. "Avoiding the Myth of the Given."

- Jackson, Frank. "Epiphenomenal Qualia." The Philosophical Quarterly 32, no. 127 (1982): 127–36.

- Byrne, Alex, Review of Ludlow, et al. "There's Something About Mary." Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, 2009.

- Rayo, Agustín. Section 4.5 in The Construction of Logical Space. Oxford University Press, 2013.

12

- Ball, Derek. "There Are No Phenomenal Concepts." Mind 118, no. 472 (2009): 935–62.

- Tye, Michael. Consciousness Revisited: Materialism without Phenomenal Concepts. MIT Press, 2011, pp. 123–37.

13

- Stalnaker, Robert C. Chapters 2–4 in Our Knowledge of the Internal World. Oxford University Press, 2008

[참고문헌] 강진호, 2020년 1학기 심리철학연습(행위, 의도, 행위성) 강의계획서

서울대학교 철학과 대학원 개설 과목

• 아래 두 문헌은 본 세미나에서 논의할 모든 쟁점들의 원천을 제공한다.

- Davidson, D. (1963). “Actions, Reasons, and Causes”. reprinted in Davidson (1980/2001)

- Anscombe, G.E.M. (1957/2000). Intention (Harvard University Press)

• Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy의 다음 세 항목은 본 세미나 주제와 관련하여 유용한 지형도를

제공해준다.

- Wilson, G. & Shpall, S. “Action”

- Setiya, K. “Intention”

- Schlosser, M. “Agency”

원인으로서의 이유: 데이빗슨의 인과적 행위 이론

- Wittgenstein (1958), Blue and Brown Books, pp.14-15

- Ryle (1949), The Concept of Mind, Ch. I - 요약정리

- Ryle (1949), The Concept of Mind, Ch. III

- Ryle (1949), The Concept of Mind, Ch. X

- Davidson (1963), “Actions, Reasons, and Causes”

의도에 대한 환원주의와 비환원주의 - 의도와 의도적 행위의 관계: “크노베 효과”의 문제

- Davidson (1970), “Intending”

- Bratman (1984), “Two Faces of Intention”

- Knobe (2003), “Intentional Action and Side Effects in Ordinary Language” - 요약정리

데이빗슨의 무법칙적 일원론과 속성 부수현상론의 문제

- Davidson (1970), “Mental Events”

- Davidson (1993), “Thinking Causes”

- Kim (1993), “Can Supervenience and ‘Non-Strict Laws’ Save Anomalous Monism?”

인과적 행위 이론과 “이탈적 인과 고리”의 문제

- Davidson (1973), “Freedom to Act”

- Smith (2009), “The Explanatory Role of Being Rational”

이유의 본성과 비심리주의적 이유 이론

- Dancy (2003), Practical Reality, Ch. 5
- Dancy (2003), Practical Reality, Ch. 6
- Dancy (2003), Practical Reality, Ch. 8

행위성과 “사라지는 행위자”의 문제

- Davidson (1971), “Agency”

- Velleman (1992), “What Happens When Someone Acts?”

구성주의 행위 이론 - 사건 인과 모형 vs. 행위자 인과 모형

- Velleman (2000), “Introduction”. In The Possibility of Practical Reason

- Katsafanas (2018), “Constitutivism about Practical Reasons”

- O’Connor (2011), “Agent-Causal Theories of Freedom”

행위 설명과 1인칭 관점

- Kim (2010), “Taking the Agent’s Point of View Seriously in Action Explanation”

- Nelkin (2000), “Two Standpoints and the Belief in Freedom”

앤스컴의 『의도』

- Anscombe (1957), Intention, §§1-27

앤스컴의 『의도』(계속)

- Anscombe (1957), Intention, §§28-52

톰슨의 “소박한” 행위 이론

- Thompson (2008), “Naïve Action Theory”

[참고문헌] 장대익, 2020년 1학기 생물학의 철학 강의계획서

서울대학교 과학사 및 과학철학 협동과정 개설 과목


Part I: Introduction

 1주: 3/18 Overview: Why & What is philosophy of biology?

 2주: 3/25 What Evolution is : The Received view

[Sterelny and Kitcher 1999] ch. 2 The Received View of Evolution

†[Appleman (ed.), Darwin, pp.106-135] 또는, [종의 기원 4장] 요약정리

†[Appleman (ed.), Darwin, pp. 319-326] The Evolutionary Synthesis by P. Bowler(1984) 요약정리

― Does evolutionary theory need a rethink?, Nature, vol. 561, 161-164 요약정리

Part II: Genes, Molecules, and Organisms

 3주: 4/1The Challenges from the Gene's Eye View

[Sterelny and Kitcher 1999] ch. 3 The Gene's Eye View of Evolution 

[Sterelny and Kitcher 1999] ch. 4 The Organism Strikes Back 요약정리

† Sterelny, K. and Kitcher, P. (1988). The Return of the Genes. Journal of Philosophy, 85, 339-360.

†Lloyd, E.(2005), Why the Gene Will Not Return, Philosophy of Science 72, 287-310.

 4주: 4/8 Taking Development Seriously

[Sterelny and Kitcher 1999] ch. 5 The Developmental Systems Alternative

[Godfrey-Smith 2014] ch. 6 Genes 요약정리

†Griffiths, Paul E and Hochman, Adam (October 2015), Developmental Systems Theory. In: eLS. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester. 요약정리

†Haig, D.(2012), Strategic gene, Biology and Philosophy 27, 461-479.

―Griffiths, P.E. and Gray, R.D.(2001). Darwinism and Developmental Systems, in S. Oyama, P. E. Griffiths, and Russell D. Gray (eds.). Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution, 195-218.

 5주: 휴강

 6주: 4/22 Evo Devo: The New Synthesis?

†Müller, G. B.(2007), Evo-devo: extending the evolutionary synthesis, Nature Review: Genetics, 8, 943-949.

†Brakefield, P. M.(2011), Evo-devo and accounting for Darwin’s endless forms, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 366, 2069-2075

―Gilbert, S. et al.(1996), Resynthesising evolutionary and developmental biology, Developmental Biology 173, 357-372.

―Hoekstra, H. E. & Coyne, J. A.(2007), The Locus of Evolution: Evo Devo and the Genetics of Adaptation, Evolution 61(5), 995-1016.

―Wagner, G. P., Pavlicev, M., $ Cheverud, J. M.(2007), The Road to modularity, Emerging Conceptual Framework of Evolutionary Developmental Biology, Nature Review: Genetics, 8, 921-931.

 7주: 4/29 Information and Genes to Organisms

[Sterelny and Kitcher 1999] ch. 6 Mendel and Molecules 

[Sterelny and Kitcher 1999] ch. 7 Reduction: For and Against

[Godfrey-Smith] ch. 9 Information

†Bergstrom, C.T. & Rosvall, M.(2011), The Transmission sense of Information, Biology and Philosophy 26, 159-176.

†Stegmann, U.E.(2009), DNA, Inference, and Information, BJPS 60, 1-17

―Kitcher, P.(2001). Battling the Undead: How (and How Not) to Resist Genetic Determinism. in R. Singh, K. Krimbas, D. Paul and J. Beatty (Eds.). Thinking about evolution: istorical, philosophical and political perspectives, Cambridge University Press. 396-414.

Part III. Levels of Selection and Altruism

 8주: 5/6 Multilevel selection debate

―Lloyd, E.(2012), The units and levels of selection, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/selection-units/

†Sober, E. and Wilson, D.S.(2000), Summary of Unto Others: The Evolution & Psychology of Unselfish Behavior, in Kats, L.D.(ed.)(2000), Evolutionary Origins of Morality, Imprint Academic, 185-206.

†Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, C. E., & Wilson, E.O.(2010), The evolution of eusociality, Nature 466, 1057-1062. 

& Okasha, S.(2010), Altruism researchers must cooperate, Nature 46, 653-655. 

& Abbot et al.(2011), Brief communications arising from Nowak et al., Nature 471. E1-E8 

& Nowak et al.(2011), reply, Nature 471, E9-E10.

 9주: 5/13 Evolution of Human Altruism

†West, S. A., Griffin, A. S., & Gardner, A.(2008), Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21, 374-385.

†Gintis, H., Henrich, J., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., and Fehr, E.(2008), Strong Reciprocity and the Roots of Human Morality, Social Justice Research 21, 241-253.

†Sterelny, K.(2016), Cooperation, Culture, and Conflict, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67, 31–58. 요약정리

Part IV. Adaptation, Environment, and Progress

 10주: 5/20 Adaptation, environment and adaptationism

†Gould, S. J. and Lewontin, R.(1979), The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist Programme, in Proc. of the Royal Society of London, ser. B., 205, 581-98. - 요약정리

†Orzack, S. H.(2008), Testing adaptive hypotheses, optimality models, and adaptationism, in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology, in M. Ruse (ed.), Oxford University Press, pp. 87–112.

†Beatty, J.(2006), Replaying Life’s Tape, Journal of Philosophy 103(7), 336-362.

Part V. Biology and Culture

11주: 5/27 Conceptual issues in Evolutionary Psychology

†Buller, D. J.(2005), Evolutionary psychology: the emperor's new paradigm, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9:277-283.

†Machery, E.(2016), Discovery and Confirmation in Evolutionary Psychology, in J. Prinz(ed.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Psychology, Oxford University Press. 1-28.

―Mameli, M.(2007), Evolution and psychology in philosophical perspective, in R. I. M. Dunbar, and L. Barrett(eds.)(2007), The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, Oxford University Press, 21-34.

12주: 6/3 Cultural evolution and Human uniqueness (I)

†Mesoudi, A.(2016), Cultural evolution: integrating psychology, evolution and culture, Current Opinion in Psychology 7, 17–22

†Dean, L. G., Vale, G. L., Laland, K. N., Flynn, E., and Kendal, R. L.(2014), Human cumulative culture: a comparative perspective, Biological Reviews 89(2), 284–301.

―Ramsey, G.(2013), Culture in humans and other animals, Biology and Philosophy 28, 457-479.

13주: 6/10 Cultural evolution and Human uniqueness (II)

†Henrich, J., Boyd, R., and Richerson, P. J.(2008), Five Misunderstandings about Cultural Evolution, Human Nature 19, 119-137

†Dennett, D.(2005), From Typo to Thinko: When Evolution Graduated to Semantic Norms, in Levinson, S. C. and Jaisson, P.(eds.), Evolution and Culture

†Sperber, D.(2014), How Darwinian is cultural evolution?, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369:20130368. - 요약정리

―Sterelny, K.(2005), Memes revisited, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57, 145-165.

 14주: 6/17 종합 정리 + 종강 (final paper due ~ 6/24)

[참고문헌] 석사논문 초고 참고문헌 목록

김영식, 임경순 (2007), 『과학사신론』 (제 2판), 다산출판사.

박영태 (1994), 「과학적 실재론과 「기적의 논증」」, 하종호 외, 『수반의 형이상학』, 철학과현실사.

이봉재 (1999), 「과학적 실재론」, 『현대 과학철학의 문제들』, 아르케.

최성호 (2006), 「과학의 성공과 참신한 예측에 대한 레플린의 견해」, 『철학탐구』, 19권, pp. 163-179.

Barnes, E. C. (2018), "Prediction versus Accommodation", in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition).

Blumenthal, G. and Ladyman, J. (2017), “The Development of Problems Within the Phlogiston Theories, 1766–1791”, Foundations of Chemistry, 19(3): pp. 241-280.

Bowler, P. J. and Morus, I. R. (2005), Making Modern Science: A Historical Survey, University of Chicaco Press. [홍성욱, 김봉국 역 (2008), 『현대과학의 풍경 1: ‘과학혁명’에서 ‘인간과학의 출현’까지 과학발달의 역사적 사건들』, 궁리출판]

Boyd, R. N. (1985). “Lex orandi est lex credendi,” in P. M. Churchland and C. A. Hooker (eds.), Images of Science: Essays on Realism and Empiricism, with a Reply from Bas C. van Fraassen, University of Chicago Press.

Brown, J. R. (1985), “Explaining the Success of Science”, Ratio Bristol 27(1): pp. 49-66.

arrier, M. (1991), "What Is Wrong with the Miracle Argument?", Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 22(1): 23-36.

_____ (1993), “What Is Right with the Miracle Argument: Establishing a Taxonomy of Natural Kinds”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 24(3): pp. 391-409.

Chakravartty, A. (2017), "Scientific Realism", E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition).

Chang, H. (2009), “We Have Never Been Whiggish (About Phlogiston)”, Centaurus 51(4): pp. 239-264.

_____ (2010), “The Hidden History of Phlogiston”, HYLE – International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 16(2): pp. 47-79.

_____ (2012a), “Incommensurability: Revisiting the Chemical Revolution" in V. Kindi and T. Arabatzis (eds.), Kuhn's the Structure of the Scientific Revolutions Revisited.

_____ (2012b), Is Water H2O?: Evidence, Realism and Pluralism, Springer Science & Business Media.

Craver, C. F. (2002), "The Structures of Scientific Theories", in P. Machamer and M. Silberstein (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science, pp. 55-79.

Cummiskey, D. (1992), “Reference Failure and Scientific Realism: A Response to the Meta-induction”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 43(1): pp. 21-40.

Fahrbach, L. (2011), "How the Growth of Science Ends Theory Change", Synthese 180(2): pp 139-155.

Giere, R. N., Bickle, J., and Mauldin R. (2005), Understanding Scientific Reasoning (5th Edition), Wadsworth Publication Company. [조인래, 이영의, 남현 역 (2008), 『과학적 추론의 이해』, 소화.]

Giere, R. N. (1983), “Testing Theoretical Hypotheses”, in John Earman (ed.), Testing Scientific Theories, University of Minnesota Press.

Hoyningen-Huene, P. (2008), “Thomas Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution: A Re-assessment”, Foundations of Chemistry 10(2): pp. 101-115.

Kitcher, P. (1993), The Advancement of Science, Oxford University Press.

Kuhn, T. S. (1977), "Objectivity, Value Judgement, and Theory Choice", in The Essential Tension, University of Chicago Press.

Ladyman, J. (1999), "Review. A Novel Defense of Scientific Realism. Jarrett Leplin", The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50(1), 181-188.

_____ (2002), Understanding Philosophy of Science, Routledge. [박영태 역 (2003), 『과학철학의 이해』, 이학사]

_____ (2011), "Structural Realism Versus Standard Scientific Realism: The Case of Phlogiston and Dephlogisticated Air", Synthese 180(2), 87-101.

Laudan, L. (1981), "A Confutation of Convergent Realism", Philosophy of Science 48(1), 19-49.

_____ (1984), "Explaining the Success of Science: Beyond Epistemic Realism and Relativism", in A. I. Tauber (ed.), Science and the Quest for Reality, Palgrave Macmillan.

Leplin, J. (1997), A Novel Defense of Scientific Realism, Oxford University Press.

_____ (2004), “A Theory’s Predictive Success Can Warrant Belief in the Unobservable Entities It Postulates”, in C. Hitchcock (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science, pp. 117-132.

Lipton, P. (2004), Inference to the Best Explanation (2nd Edition), Routledge.

Magnus, P., and Callender, C. (2004), "Realist Ennui and the Base Rate Fallacy", Philosophy of Science 71(3), 320-338.

Maxwell, G. (1962), "The Ontological Status of Theoretical Entities", Scientific Explanation, Space, and Time, University of Minnesota Press, pp. 181-192.

Mizrahi, M. (2015), "Historical Inductions: New Cherries, Same Old Cherry-picking", International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 29(2), 129-148.

Musgrave, A. (1985), "Realism versus Constructive Empiricism", in P. M. Churchland and C. A. Hooker (eds.), Images of Science: Essays on Realism and Empiricism.

_____ (1988), "The Ultimate Argument for Scientific Realism", in R. Nola (ed.), Relativism and Realism in Science, Springer.

Monton, B., and van Fraassen, B. C., (2003), “Constructive Empiricism and Modal Nominalism”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54(3): pp. 405–422.

Monton, B. and Mohler, C. (2017), "Constructive Empiricism", in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition).

Okasha, S. (2002), Philosophy of Science: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press.

Psillos, S. (1999), Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth, Routledge, Retrieved from ProQuest eBook database

Putnam, H. (1975a), “What Is Mathematical Truth?” in Mathematics, Matter and Method (Philosophical Papers, Vol. I), Cambridge University Press, pp. 60-78.

_____ (1975b), "What Is “Realism"?", Proceedings of Aristotelian Society, 76: pp. 177 - 194 [Reprinted in Putnam, H. (1978), Meaning and the Moral Sciences, Routledge.]

_____ (1981), Reason, Truth, and History, Cambridge University Press. [김효명 역 (2002), 『이성, 진리, 역사』, 민음사.]

Van Fraassen, B. C. (1980), The Scientific Image, Oxford University Press.

_____ (1994), “Gideon Rosen on Constructive Empiricism”, Philosophical Studies 74(2): pp. 179–192.

_____ (1998), “The Agnostic Subtly Probabilified”, Analysis 58(3): pp. 212–220.

Vickers, P. (2017), "Understanding the Selective Realist Defence Against the PMI", Synthese 194(9): pp. 3221-3232

_____ (2018), "Quo Vadis Selective Realism?", Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science 9(1): pp. 118-121.

Worrall, J. (1989), “Fresnel, Poisson and the White Spot: The Role of Successful Predictions in the Acceptance of Scientific Theories”, in D. Gooding, T. Pinch and S. Schaffer (eds.), The Uses of Experiment, Cambridge University Press, pp. 135-157.

Wray, K. B. (2007), "A Selectionist Explanation for the Success and Failures of Science", Erkenntnis 67(1): pp. 81-9.

_____ (2010), "Selection and Predictive Success", Erkenntnis 72(3): pp. 365-377.

_____ (2018), Resisting Scientific Realism, Cambridge University Press.

_____ (2019a), “Discarded Theories: The Role of Changing Interests”, Synthese, 196(2): pp. 553-569.

_____ (2019b), "Kuhn, the History of Chemistry, and the Philosophy of Science", HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 9(1): pp. 75-92.